Freedom Not To Speak

There are 1 messages in this topic Watch this topic for replies

Add Reply Back to forum "News" Back to Index

SySAdmin

ASE Bot Joined: January 10, 1995 Status: Offline Posts: 120 Rep:

Freedom Not To Speak

Wed Mar 7, 2007 6:07:09 AM #35183 Perm Link

There is a new news item posted at »ASE Labs

»Freedom Not To Speak

It is amazing that companies sue Google for refusing to run their ads. <a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1030_3-6164943.html">Companies such as Google are for-profit and are not subject to public forum laws</a>.

Quote
In the case of Langdon v. Google, et al, the plaintiff sued Google, Microsoft and Yahoo for their failure to run advertisements. These related to the plaintiff's Web sites, which purportedly exposed fraud perpetrated by North Carolina government officials and reported atrocities supposedly committed by the Chinese government. The plaintiff argued that the refusal of the defendants violated his First Amendment and other legal rights. What's more, the plaintiff claimed that even though Internet search engines are maintained by private companies, they essentially are public forums, like malls and shopping centers, and so are subject to the First Amendment. The judge blew that argument out of the water, holding that the plaintiff failed to properly state a claim for violation of his free speech rights under the First Amendment, precisely because the defendants "are private, for-profit companies, not subject to constitutional free speech guarantees." The court deemed "specious" the plaintiff's argument that somehow the defendants were governmental "state actors" who were required to protect the plaintiff's freedom of speech.

Freedom Not To Speak

Quote

Quick Reply

Login

Navigation

Latest News

Latest Articles

Latest Topics

Press Release